State of Nature
The hypothetical pre-political condition from which social-contract theorists derive the legitimacy and limits of political authority.
The state of nature is a thought experiment in early modern political philosophy: the condition human beings would be in if there were no political authority. Early-modern social-contract theorists used the device to derive the rational basis and proper limits of government from features of human nature itself.
Thomas Hobbes's state of nature (Leviathan, 1651) is a war of all against all — a condition in which life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short — and the rational solution is the surrender of nearly all rights to an absolute sovereign. John Locke's state of nature (Second Treatise, 1689) is more peaceful: human beings are equal and free under the natural law, and they form government chiefly to remedy the inconveniences of unenforced rights. Jean-Jacques Rousseau's state of nature (Discourse on Inequality, 1755) is more peaceful still — a condition of self-sufficient natural goodness corrupted only by the introduction of property and social comparison. Each theorist's state of nature does the same argumentative work: it secures whichever political conclusion the theorist wants the contract to produce.
The state of nature is a thought experiment, not a historical claim. Hobbes is explicit: the natural condition of mankind is what we would be reduced to if government collapsed, not necessarily a phase of historical development. Locke leaves the question of historical instantiation more open, citing examples from the Americas. Rousseau treats his state of nature as deliberately hypothetical — a condition to be reasoned about, not a past to be recovered.
Feminist and post-colonial critics have noted that the contractarian state of nature is constructed around the figure of the propertied adult male and that women, children, dependents, and colonized peoples are typically absent from it as parties to the contract. Carole Pateman's The Sexual Contract argues that the social contract is preceded by a sexual contract that subordinates women. Charles Mills's The Racial Contract argues that European political theory rests on a tacit contract that constitutes non-Europeans as outside the political community. The state-of-nature device, on these readings, secures more than it advertises.
How philosophers have framed state of nature
| Philosopher | Position |
|---|---|
| Thomas Hobbes | War of all against all; life solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. |
| John Locke | State of equality and freedom under the natural law; remediable inconveniences. |
| Jean-Jacques Rousseau | Peaceful self-loving condition corrupted by the introduction of property. |
| John Rawls | Replaced by the original position behind the veil of ignorance. |
Representative quotes
-
Thomas Hobbes
-
“The war of all against all.”
The First Part, Chapter 13, p. 62
-
-
John Locke
-
“All mankind being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.”
Second Treatise of Government , Ch. II, sec. 6
-
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
-
Attributed to Jean-Jacques Rousseau:
“Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”
-
-
John Rawls
-
“The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance.”
Chapter I, Section 3, pg. 12
-