Übermensch
Nietzsche's figure of the human type capable of creating new values after the death of God — usually translated as overman or higher type.
The Übermensch is announced by Zarathustra in the prologue of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883–85): I teach you the Übermensch. Man is something that shall be overcome. The figure stands for the human type capable of affirming life in its full conditions — including suffering and the eternal recurrence — and creating new values after the collapse of the Christian-Platonic moral inheritance.
Nietzsche presents the Übermensch as a counterweight to the last man, the comfortable egalitarian for whom nothing is worth striving for. The Übermensch is not a biological successor to humanity (Nietzsche was scornful of the social-Darwinist readings) but a cultural and spiritual achievement: the type whose values are self-imposed rather than inherited. Subsequent twentieth-century misreadings, especially the Nazi appropriation, distorted the concept beyond recognition; recent scholarship has worked to recover Nietzsche's original meaning.
The Übermensch should not be confused with the related Nietzschean concepts of the higher type, the free spirit, or the philosopher of the future. The Übermensch is a regulative ideal — a figure announced but never instantiated — whereas the higher type and the free spirit name actual cultural achievements Nietzsche thought were possible and rare. Reading the Übermensch as a literal future biological successor is a category mistake the texts do not support.
Nietzsche's contemporaries and successors have read the Übermensch in sharply different directions. Heidegger treated it as the consummation of the Western metaphysics of subjectivity Nietzsche meant to overcome — a final inversion that remains within the framework it inverts. Camus argued in The Rebel that the Übermensch slides into the rationalization of historical violence. Recent scholars including Walter Kaufmann, Bernard Reginster, and Alexander Nehamas have worked to recover the figure from its twentieth-century distortions.
How philosophers have framed übermensch
| Philosopher | Position |
|---|---|
| Friedrich Nietzsche | The human type capable of affirming life and creating new values after the death of God. |
| Arthur Schopenhauer | His will-to-live underlies Nietzsche's reversal; affirmation of will is precisely what should be denied. |
| Soren Kierkegaard | Self-overcoming is real but only in the leap of faith before God; without God it collapses into despair. |
| Albert Camus | The figure is admirable but slides into rationalizing historical violence. |
| Jean-Paul Sartre | Democratized: every human being is condemned to the freedom Nietzsche reserved for the higher type. |
Representative quotes
-
Friedrich Nietzsche
-
“I now myself live, in every detail, striving for wisdom, while I formerly merely worshipped and idolized the wise.”
Letter to Mathilde Mayer, July 16, 1878, cited in Karl Jaspers , Nietzsche (Baltimore: 1997), p. 46
-
-
Arthur Schopenhauer
-
“We forfeit three-fourths of ourselves in order to be like other people.”
As attributed in Dictionary of Quotations from Ancient and Modern English and Foreign Sources (1899) by James Wood, p. 624
-
-
Soren Kierkegaard
-
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.”
Det er ganske sandt, hvad Philosophien siger, at Livet maa forstaaes baglænds. Men derover glemmer man den anden Sætning, at det maa leves forlænds.
-
-
Albert Camus
-
“One must imagine Sisyphus happy.”
Original French: La lutte elle-même vers les sommets suffit à remplir un cœur d'homme; il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux. | Variant translation: The fight itself towards the summits suffices to fill a heart of man; it is necessary to imagine Sisyphus happy.
-
-
Jean-Paul Sartre
-
“Hell is other people.”
Alors, c'est ça l'enfer. Je n'aurais jamais cru... vous vous rappelez: le soufre, le bûcher, le gril... ah! Quelle plaisanterie. Pas besoin de gril, l'enfer, c'est les autres.
-