Friedrich Nietzsche vs Immanuel Kant on Knowledge
Kant restricts knowledge to appearances structured by the categories of the understanding, leaving things in themselves in principle unknowable. Nietzsche pushes the restriction further: there is no fixed knowing subject and no neutral standpoint from which to know, only interpretations made under conditions of power. The Kantian critique limits knowledge to what experience allows; the Nietzschean critique exposes the will to knowledge as a problem in its own right.
About this topic
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge. Philosophers have asked what distinguishes knowledge from mere opinion, whether it requires certainty or can be probabilistic, and how perception, reason, memory, and testimony each contribute. Ancient skeptics challenged the possibility of knowledge altogether, while rationalists located its source in reason and empiricists in experience. Contemporary epistemology investigates justification, reliability, and the social conditions under which beliefs count as knowing.
For a side-by-side overview of the two philosophers more broadly, see the full Friedrich Nietzsche vs Immanuel Kant comparison. To browse philosophy more widely on this theme, see the Knowledge quotes hub.
Representative quotes on knowledge
Friedrich Nietzsche on knowledge
-
“Postcard to Franz Overbeck , Sils-Maria (30 July 1881), tr. Walter Kaufmann , The Portable Nietzsche (1954)”
I am utterly amazed, utterly enchanted! I have a precursor , and what a precursor! I hardly knew Spinoza : that I should have turned to him just now , was inspired by "instinct." Not only is his overtendency like mine—namely to make all knowledge the most powerful affect — but in five main points of his doctrine I recognize myself; this most unusual and loneliest thinker is closest to me precisely -
“Against that positivism which stops before phenomena, saying "there are only facts," I should say: no, it is precisely facts that do not exist, only interpretations.”
Notebooks (Late 1886 – Spring 1887) | Popular usage: "There are no facts, only interpretations. -
“Notebooks (Late 1886 – Spring 1887)”
Against that positivism which stops before phenomena, saying "there are only facts," I should say: no, it is precisely facts that do not exist, only interpretations. -
“Popular usage: "There are no facts, only interpretations.”
Against that positivism which stops before phenomena, saying "there are only facts," I should say: no, it is precisely facts that do not exist, only interpretations. -
“In Germany there is much complaining about my "eccentricities." But since it is not known where my center is, it won't be easy to find out where or when I have thus far been "eccentric." That I was a philologist , for example, meant that I was outside my center (which fortunately does not mean that I was a poor philologist). Likewise, I now regard my having been a Wagnerian as eccentric. It was a highly dangerous experiment; now that I know it did not ruin me, I also know what significance it had for me — it was the most severe test of my character.”
Letter to Carl Fuchs (14 December 1887)
Immanuel Kant on knowledge
-
“All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the understanding, and ends with reason.”
All human knowledge begins with intuitions, proceeds from thence to concepts, and ends with ideas. -
“Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind.”
A 51, B 75 -
“The body is a temple.”
A lecture at Königsberg (1775), as quoted in A New Dictionary of Quotations on Historical Principles from Ancient and Modern Sources (1946) by H. L. Mencken , p. 1043 -
“Immanuel Kant , Kant's Critique of Judgment (1892) Tr. J.H. Bernard”
Moral Teleology supplies the deficiency in physical Teleology , and first establishes a Theology ; because the latter, if it did not borrow from the former without being observed, but were to proceed consistently, could only found a Demonology , which is incapable of any definite concept. -
“Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysics of Ethics by Immanuel Kant, trans. J.W. Semple, ed. with Iintroduction by Rev. Henry Calderwood (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1886) (3rd edition). Chapter: GENERAL DIVISION OF JURISPRUDENCE.”
Freedom is the alone unoriginated birthright of man, and belongs to him by force of his humanity ; and is independence on the will and co-action of every other in so far as this consists with every other person’s freedom.
Continue reading
- Full comparison: Friedrich Nietzsche vs Immanuel Kant
- Full profile: Friedrich Nietzsche
- Full profile: Immanuel Kant
- All quotes on this theme: Knowledge quotes from across philosophy
- Browse all philosopher comparisons