1001Philosophers

Heraclitus vs Parmenides

Heraclitus and Parmenides are the two great pre-Socratic philosophers whose opposing views frame much of subsequent Greek metaphysics. Plato and Aristotle treated their dispute as the founding problem of Western philosophy, and the contrast between flux and being remains a touchstone of philosophical thinking about change.

At a glance

HeraclitusParmenides
Datesc. 535 BC – c. 475 BCc. 515 BC – c. 460 BC
NationalityGreekGreek
EraAncientAncient
Movements Pre-Socratic, Ancient Greek Philosophy Pre-Socratic, Ancient Greek Philosophy
Profile Heraclitus → Parmenides →

Where they agree

Both rejected mythological explanation in favor of rational analysis of being itself, and both held that the truth about reality is hidden from ordinary experience and accessible only through philosophical reflection. Each presented his views in dense and often paradoxical philosophical poetry.

Where they disagree

Heraclitus held that reality is constituted by ceaseless change governed by an underlying logos: all things flow, and the unity of the world is the unity of opposites in tension. Parmenides held the contrary: change and plurality are illusions, and what truly is must be eternal, unchanging, and undivided. The dispute set the terms for Plato's distinction between becoming and being, and for Aristotle's analysis of motion and substance.

Representative quotes

Heraclitus

  • “You cannot step into the same river twice.”

    ποταμῷ γὰρ οὐκ ἔστιν ἐμβῆναι δὶς τῷ αὐτῷ

  • “The way up and the way down are one and the same.”

    ὁδὸς ἄνω κάτω μία καὶ ὡυτή

  • “Character is destiny.”

    ἦθος ἀνθρώπῳ δαίμων

Parmenides

  • “You must learn all things, both the unshaken heart of persuasive truth , and the opinions of mortals in which there is no true warranty.”

    Frag B 1.28-30, quoted by Sextus Empiricus , Against the Mathematicians , vii. 3; Simplicius , Commentary on the Heavens , 557-8; Proclus , Commentary on the Timaeus I , 345

  • “Frag B 1.28-30, quoted by Sextus Empiricus , Against the Mathematicians , vii. 3; Simplicius , Commentary on the Heavens , 557-8; Proclus , Commentary on the Timaeus I , 345”

    You must learn all things, both the unshaken heart of persuasive truth , and the opinions of mortals in which there is no true warranty.

  • “The only roads of enquiry there are to think of: one, that it is and that it is not possible for it not to be, this is the path of persuasion (for truth is its companion); the other, that it is not and that it must not be — this I say to you is a path wholly unknowable.”

    Frag. B 2.2-6, quoted by Proclus , Commentary on the Timaeus I , 345

Continue reading