Max Stirner Quotes on Knowledge
Max Stirner (Johann Kaspar Schmidt, 1806–1856), the German Young Hegelian whose The Ego and Its Own (Der Einzige und sein Eigentum, 1844) gave the post-Hegelian left its most uncompromising statement of egoist anarchism, defended the case that every general category — God, humanity, the state, morality, even the rational self of philosophy — is a "spook" (Spuk) projected by the individual ego (the Einzige) and granted an autonomous authority that is, on examination, nothing but the ego's own alienated power. Genuine knowledge for Stirner is the ego's lucid recognition of itself as the "creative nothing" (das schöpferische Nichts) out of which all such categories proceed and to which they may be reclaimed.
Quotes
-
“I am owner of my might, and I am so when I know myself as unique.”
Dover 2005, p. 366 -
“Do we want to put pedagogy into the hands of the philosophers? Nothing less than that! They would behave themselves awkwardly enough. It shall be entrusted only to those who are more than philosophers, who are in that respect more even than humanists or realists.”
Wollen wir etwa die Pädagogik den Philosophen in die Hände spielen? Nichts weniger als das! Sie würden sich ungeschickt genug benehmen. Denen allein werde sie anvertraut, die mehr sind als Philosophen, darum aber auch unendlich mehr als Humanisten oder Realisten. -
“Yes, so it is that knowledge itself must die in order to blossom forth again in death as will; the freedom of thought , belief , and conscience, these wonderful flowers of three centuries will sink back into the lap of mother earth so that a new freedom, the freedom will , will be nourished with its most noble juices.”
p. 19 -
“The will is not fundamentally right, as the practical ones would like very much to assure us; one may not pass over the desire for knowledge in order to stand immediately in the will, but knowledge perfects itself to will when it desensualizes itself and creates itself as a spirit "which builds its own body.”
p. 21 -
“It is truly not the merit of the school if we do not come out selfish. Each sort of corresponding pride and every wind of covetousness, eagerness for office, mechanical and servile officiousness, hypocrisy, etc., is bound as much with extensive knowledge as with elegant, classical education, and since this whole instruction exercises no influence of any sort on our ethical behavior, it thus frequently falls to the fate of being forgotten in the same measure as it is not used : one shakes off the dust of the school.”
p. 22 -
“In the pedagogical as in certain other spheres freedom is not allowed to erupt, the power of the opposition is not allowed to put a word in edgewise: they want submissiveness . Only a formal and material training is being aimed at and only scholars come out of the menageries of the humanists, only "useful citizens" out of those of the realists, both of whom are indeed nothing but subservient people. Our good background of recalcitrancy [sic] gets strongly suppressed and with it the development of knowledge to free will. The result of school is then philistinism.”
p. 23 -
“If man puts his honor first in relying upon himself, knowing himself and applying himself, this in self-reliance, self-assertion, and freedom, he then strives to rid himself of the ignorance which makes a strange impenetrable object a barrier and a hindrance to his self-knowledge.”
p. 23