1001Philosophers

Edmund Husserl vs Martin Heidegger vs Maurice Merleau-Ponty

Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty are the three central figures of twentieth-century phenomenology. Heidegger was Husserl's student and chosen successor; Merleau-Ponty developed Heideggerian phenomenology in a distinctively French direction. The three together constitute the phenomenological tradition in its most influential forms.

Key differences at a glance

Edmund HusserlMartin HeideggerMaurice Merleau-Ponty
Foundational category Transcendental ego: source of meaning-constitution.Being-in-the-world: existence always already engaged.Lived body: third term beyond consciousness and being.
Method Phenomenological reduction brackets the natural attitude.Hermeneutic interpretation of the everyday and the historical.Phenomenology of perception starting from embodied experience.
Aim of phenomenology Rigorous science of consciousness and essences.The question of being, recovered from forgetting.Description of perception and embodiment in the lived world.
Status of the subject Transcendental ego as the source of all meaning.Dasein as the site of the question of being.Embodied subject continuous with its world.

Biographical facts

Edmund HusserlMartin HeideggerMaurice Merleau-Ponty
Dates 1859 – 19381889 – 19761908 – 1961
Nationality GermanGermanFrench
Era ContemporaryContemporaryContemporary
Profile Edmund Husserl →Martin Heidegger →Maurice Merleau-Ponty →

Where they agree

All three held that the right starting point for philosophy is the careful description of experience as it is lived rather than as construed by scientific or metaphysical theory, all three rejected naturalist reductions of consciousness, and all three took the analysis of intentionality as central. Each worked in painstaking conceptual detail.

Where they disagree

Husserl held that phenomenology is a rigorous science of consciousness, with the transcendental ego as the source of meaning-constitution; the proper philosophical method is the phenomenological reduction, which brackets the natural attitude. Heidegger rejected the transcendental ego and the reduction: human existence is being-in-the-world, always already engaged with things and others, and the question of being is more fundamental than the analysis of consciousness. Merleau-Ponty rejected both the Husserlian transcendental ego and the Heideggerian primacy of being for a phenomenology of perception centered on the lived body — the body as neither subject nor object but as the third term that resists either framework.

Representative quotes

Edmund Husserl

  • “A new fundamental science, pure phenomenology , has developed within philosophy: This is a science of a thoroughly new type and endless scope. It is inferior in methodological rigor to none of the modern sciences. All philosophical disciplines are rooted in pure phenomenology, through whose development, and through it alone, they obtain their proper force.”

    Wikiquote
  • “To every object there corresponds an ideally closed system of truths that are true of it and, on the other hand, an ideal system of possible cognitive processes by virtue of which the object and the truths about it would be given to any cognitive subject.”

    Wikiquote
  • “... bloße Erfahrung ist keine Wissenschaft.”

    Experience by itself is not science.

Martin Heidegger

  • “Language is the house of Being.”

    Die Sprache ist das Haus des Seins.
  • “Man is not the lord of beings. Man is the shepherd of Being.”

    Letter on Humanism (1947)
  • “The most thought-provoking thing in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking.”

    Das Bedenklichste in unserer bedenklichen Zeit ist, dass wir noch nicht denken.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty

  • “Montaigne [puts] not self-satisfied understanding but a consciousness astonished at itself at the core of human existence.”

    Signs , trans. R. McCleary (Evanston: 1964), p. 203
  • “Signs , trans. R. McCleary (Evanston: 1964), p. 203”

    Montaigne [puts] not self-satisfied understanding but a consciousness astonished at itself at the core of human existence.
  • “[The sensate body possesses] an art of interrogating the sensible according to its own wishes, an inspired exegesis”

    The Visible and the Invisible , trans. A. Lingis (Evanston: 1968), p. 135

Pairwise comparisons

Continue reading